Jennifer Lopez is dealing with to keep exclusive video footage the girl once acquired with her first partner, Ojani Noa, from viewing the light of day. The video — which consists of 27 several hours of footage — allegedly includes love-making situations through the pair’s vacation back in 1997. Noa attempted to sell the tape, which includes sparked the best battle with the balmy singer.

But the 41-year-old singer was able to get a judge order barring Noa right from releasing the tape, by least for the day. In Monday, Denver Region Superior Judge Judge John Chalfant reigned over in her favor and issued a temporary restraining purchase stopping the distribution on the film. Yet , the evaluate declined to avoid media shops from walk the racy footage in the event they get lucky and get their hands on it.

Noa’s lawyer, Impotence Meyer, is definitely arguing that his client didn’t violate any confidentiality agreements with Lopez if he started store shopping the job around. States that the video footage is essential to achieve sex record and says he’s just making a mockumentary about the couple’s tumultuous romantic relationship.

Though Noa was unable to discharge the movie, this individual still desires to do so. He reportedly states that the tape is safe to discharge now that Lopez has withdrawn her claim against him while the case is at arbitration. Matching to In contact magazine, the master tape for the footage is currently in a central depository although Meyer feels that they have noticed a legal loophole and will be competent to release it soon.

J Lo’s ex-husband had been caught along with his hand in the cookie jar once just before, and the “I Can’t Believe It” singer isn’t spending any chances this time around. She just lately sued Noa married-dating.org for $10 mil claiming that he breached a confidentiality agreement when he attempted to promote the home online video video clip from their marital relationship, which just lasted 13 months.

Noa has already filed his own suit against the alluring star, claiming that the lady wrongfully fired him from her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He likewise attemptedto write a tell-all about their marital relationship and was blocked by simply Lopez’s solicitors. In that previous round of litigation, Noa was purchased to shell out the singer money and decided not to show for money any romantic details about the relationship.